TAMPA, Fla. – Retired Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, the former National Security Council official who testified during President Donald Trump’s first impeachment inquiry, is now seeking the Democratic nomination in Florida’s 2026 U.S. Senate special election.
Read more Andrei Vasilevskiy receives NHL’s Vezina Trophy as top goaltender
In an interview with FOX 13 Political Editor Craig Patrick, Vindman laid out his views on national security, rising energy prices, Florida’s insurance crisis, healthcare spending and Social Security.
Running for Senate
What we know:
The conversation began with Vindman’s role in President Trump’s first impeachment and whether anything he has seen during the current administration rises to that level again.
Rather than directly naming any potential impeachable offense, Vindman framed the race around what he called “misplaced priorities” in Washington, arguing voters were promised lower costs and economic relief but instead are facing growing financial pressure.
“For me, this is a story of misplaced priorities,” Vindman said. “I’m running to make sure Floridians have representation in the Senate—not a rubber stamp.”
Pressed again on impeachment specifically, Vindman pivoted back to what he described as the need for independent representation focused on national security and affordability.
Global military strategy
Big picture view:
Patrick also asked Vindman how he would approach U.S. military intervention in several global flashpoints.
On Taiwan, Vindman declined to commit in advance to authorizing force if China invades, saying any vote should be based on the facts at the time and national security interests.
He said he would evaluate any request for military force independently and not along party lines.
On Cuba, Vindman signaled opposition to direct military intervention aimed at toppling the regime, arguing that military action alone would not achieve lasting democratic change.
Instead, he said the U.S. should use Cuba’s current economic weakness as leverage for diplomacy aimed at political and economic reforms.
“I don’t think military means are going to get us there,” he said.
On Israel, Vindman described himself as a strong supporter of the U.S.-Israel alliance but said no ally should receive a “free pass.”
He said the war in Gaza has gone on too long and reiterated support for a long-term two-state solution between Israelis and Palestinians.
Energy and Inflation
Local perspective:
With gas and utility prices remaining a top concern for voters, Patrick asked what Washington can do to lower costs beyond Vindman’s call to suspend the federal gas tax.
Vindman linked high fuel prices in part to global instability and said resolving overseas conflict remains part of the economic equation. But on domestic supply, he endorsed what he repeatedly called an “all-of-the-above” energy strategy.
He also rejected the idea of an export ban on U.S. oil and gas, saying he would avoid placing artificial constraints on market-driven energy production.
Read more Soccer tournament prep brings international crowds to Tampa stadium
Property Insurance Crisis
By the numbers:
Property insurance—one of Florida’s most urgent affordability issues—was another major focus of the interview.
When asked whether Florida still faces an insurance crisis, Vindman said yes and suggested the federal government should explore creating a national catastrophe fund to help stabilize private insurers and reduce pressure on premiums.
He compared the concept to the National Flood Insurance Program, though not necessarily as a direct expansion of it.
When Patrick noted the flood insurance program is $22.5 billion in debt, Vindman acknowledged the challenge but suggested funding mechanisms could include revenues tied to industries that have seen significant profits while contributing to climate-related risk.
He described the goal as creating a “rainy-day fund” that helps insurers remain in Florida and increases competition to lower costs for homeowners.
Healthcare, taxes and the national debt
What they’re saying:
Patrick also questioned Vindman on federal spending and the future of healthcare subsidies first expanded during the COVID-era.
Vindman defended extending Affordable Care Act premium tax credits, saying healthcare access should be expanded rather than reduced, particularly for lower-income Americans.
He argued the federal government should pay for that in part by closing tax loopholes benefiting the wealthiest Americans.
Asked what he would cut to ease borrowing pressure and reduce inflation, Vindman focused more on increasing revenue than reducing spending, again emphasizing tax code reform.
“We need to make sure everybody pays their fair share,” he said.
Social Security and the filibuster
Dig deeper:
On Social Security, Patrick asked whether Vindman would support raising the retirement age, reducing benefits, or increasing payroll taxes to address long-term solvency concerns.
Vindman did not endorse raising the retirement age or reducing benefits. Instead, he questioned the reliability of long-term insolvency projections and said strengthening funding should begin with requiring higher earners to contribute more.
The interview also turned to Senate rules and whether Vindman would support restoring the filibuster if Republicans eliminate it before Democrats regain control. Vindman said he sees value in preserving the Senate’s minority protections and expressed support for reforming—not eliminating—the rule through a talking filibuster, requiring senators to physically hold the floor if they want to block legislation. “It’s been a source of stability,” he said.
Bottom Line:
Vindman’s policy positions during the interview reflected a mix of traditional Democratic priorities and pragmatic national security language rooted in his military background.
Across foreign policy, energy and domestic spending, he repeatedly returned to a central message: independent decision-making, skepticism of party orthodoxy, and what he says is a focus on delivering results for Floridians facing rising costs at home.
Read more National Park Service ranger dies while on patrol at Mount McKinley
About the Author
